This is an excellent movie.  The story is unique and fresh, the mood is dark, ethereal, and consistent, the main character (it’s all about the main character) is rich, deep, and he draws you in.  It’s all about the main character but the other actors are excellent too.  They all play minor roles but none of them break the maya beingplayed out in front of the viewers eyes.

Who is this main character?  I had never heard of him: Ben Whishaw.  I hadn’t but he has been getting rave reviews for all his pieces.  Most recently he was in The Tempest (2010), Love Hate (2009), Bright Star (2009), The International (2009), Brideshead Revisited (2008), I’m Not There (2007), Stoned (2005), and Layer Cake (2004), How is his acting in The Perfume: excellent.  The way he embodies his character reminds me of Daniel Day-Lewis in My Left Foot; to the point where there is no distinction.  In my opinion he’d better ask Day-Lewis how to stay sane and in touch with yourself during a long career acting (or maybe they should both try to figure it out together…).

No need to go into the plot here, but I will say that it involves some very beautiful women dying (though you don’t see much of the dying itself).  So it is mildly disturbing in case you were thinking about taking the 5-year old to see it.

When the movie came on the Portuguese midnight broadcast the details added up and I knew it was worth the watch.  The story of a man fueled by an obsession, an obsession rooted in his wife’s death, driven to notice the details which open his eyes to someone suspicious.  Jeff Bridges does an excellent job as the driven man while Tim Robbins and Joan Cusack portray an excellent creepy couple…

There are a few instances in the movie where the quality may seem to sag, but I must admit that those are well worth the ending.

and you, what is your obsession?  what details are you overly aware of?

Based on an experiment conducted in 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment.  An experiment to understand more about violence, and about human nature (I guess that’s why they did it…).  Get a random group of people, divide them into two groups, one group you designate as the Guards and the other as the Prisoners.  Then they get to reenact those roles for the following 2 weeks.  The idea is that, in part, when someone plays a role they end up becoming that which they are enacting.  Ask the nicest group of people to be in a position of power of another group and ultimately the niceis will become abusive and violent.  Brings to mind Nikos Kazantsakis’ book: Christ Recrucified.

Anyway, I first watched the The Experiment 2010 version, with actors Adrien Brody and Forest Whitaker and only afterwards did I watch the 2001 version, German version with actor Moritz Bleibtreu (Run Lola Run).  The American remake hit me harder.  The German version was more realistic in that they used a fake prison located in a basement, just like the original experiment, while the Americans went and got a real prison.  Also, I think it’s more realistic that they were constantly being watched, the American version left out the role of the observer, the professor completely out.
I think it was the incredible acting of both Brody and Whitaker, but especially Whitaker, that really got to me.  Sure, the main guard captain in the German version really plays the part perfectly (Germans make excellent guards………) but Whitaker was demented!!!

The German version has a 7.9 on IMDB… not sure I’d give such high marks… The American version only got a 6.4.  I give them both a … ah, it’s just a stupid number.  Very good though!

Very powerful.  I strongly recommend both.

…cycles to the image of the inscribed stone.  The movie itself, beyond the message, is powerful.  It looks like a low-budget movie, it looks like its going to fall into the category of one of those movies where the idea is awesome but the director’s couldn’t focus on how to transmit that idea, but it doesn’t.  The filming is great, the transitions between scenes, between ideas, between characters is intelligent.  It has one of the best sex-scenes I have ever seen on cinema.  It approaches so many topics about living in this world.
I was pleasantly surprised by this movie.

What most people will find: it is a long movie and it is slow.  It is not action packed though if you dwell into its world you may find it full of life.

Samsara: “Saṃsāra (sanskrit: संसार) literally meaning “continuous flow”, is the cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth (i.e. reincarnation) within Hinduism, Buddhism, Bön, Jainism, Sikhism, and other Indian religions. The word has its origins in the sramanic traditions of ancient India, and is today used in many modern Indian languages to refer to the physical world, or family, or the universe. In modern parlance, samsara refers to a place, set of objects and possessions, but originally, the word referred to a process of continuous pursuit or flow of life. In accordance with the literal meaning, the word should either refer to a continuous stream of consciousness, or the continuous but random drift of passions, desires, emotions and experiences.” – From Wikipedia (if its from Wikipedia then it’s got to be true).

As an overview, this movie is about a tibetan man who became a monk at a very early age.  After a powerful session of meditation he finds his thoughts wondering towards earthly desires (SEX) and decides to became a family man.  It follows his trials and tribulations, his inner battle.  Treading the minefield of desires.  It follows him to his breaking point and to the moment he is faced with a choice in his life.  At that point he breaks down in tears, looks at both paths, and in the middle the camera cycles to the image of the inscribed stone…

The dream within a dream within a dream within a dream.

Another recommended movie.

This is a much more commercial movie than the ones I normally give a thumbs up to.  In fact, I’m surprised that this isn’t based on a Korean movie dating back a decade… is it?  I can’t find a link to that but I did find a Bollywood remake of Inception that is in the makings.

Anyway.  I’m giving it the thumbs up because the acting is good (when they have to act and not just do a stunt), the idea of the plot is excellent (more on this in the thumbs down section), the images are way cool!

Thumbs downs are because: for a lot of the movie they kept revealing some extra detail.  I think of that scene in Thank You For Smoking:
Jeff Megall: Sony has a futuristic sci-fi movie they’re looking to make.
Nick Naylor: Cigarettes in space?
Jeff Megall: It’s the final frontier, Nick.
Nick Naylor: But wouldn’t they blow up in an all oxygen environment?
Jeff Megall: Probably. But it’s an easy fix. One line of dialogue. ‘Thank God we invented the… you know, whatever device.’

I’d encourage simplicity, not revelation upon revelation upon revelation.

The other thumbs down is just something I didn’t get.  I didn’t really notice a significant time different between the real and dream worlds when the guy was driving the truck; but when he starts falling THEN the shift is really played upon.

And the final thumbs down was because it didn’t seem plausible how synchronized all the “kicks” ended up being; they are all super rushing to get their kick on and they all end up so perfectly.  Of course it’s a movie… I just mean, not plausible like in that scene in Mission Impossible where Cruise explodes the helicopter and the explosion sends him onto the train…. yawn…

Overall, definitely a movie to go watch and definitely to watch in the cinema or imax where the eye candy can overpower the neurons.

Da Dum!!

Yes

You have all been waiting for my return!

Cheer  -  Applause  -   Yayyyy

And here we are, you and me and the hot seriously-traumatized-lesbian-Girl-With-The-photographic-memory-and-the-Dragon-Tattoo

A great movie in my honestest opinion.  Wait, what you don’t have anything bad to say about this one?
Humm, let me see, if I were to point out some defect I’m sure I could.
For example, Harriet’s character… damn, she looks really out of this world.  I mean, when she shows up in the house she looks like a transvestite (and I am not saying this to be mean or to use “transvestite” as a negative adjective).  Maybe that’s how Swedish people see Australians… or maybe they just went overboard with imagining how tanned a Swedish person would look if they went to life in the Australian outback… maybe they didn’t go overboard… I don’t know but she looks off.

Other defects… not really.  The acting is excellent, the plot is excellent, the camera shots very good (could be better), and the script … well I wish I knew Swedish (the translations weren’t super awesome).

Go out and watch this.  I think I’m going to go buy the book and read it in bed with my wife.

Oh, and p.s. I CAN’T wait to see how the american remake is going to fuck up this great movie!!! http://www.nerdles.com/2010/07/30/daniel-craig-signs-up-for-the-girl-with-the-dragon-tattoo-remake/

I remember the first time, the very first time.  Going back home with a friend, we were both like… 9? 10? 11? I don’t know, young!  Going home and closing the curtains and putting Nightmare on Elm Street in the video.  We didn’t get very far into the movie, once the girl shot up to the ceiling spurting blood from her abdomen all over the walls…..we stopped the movie, mutual accord, opened the curtains and went skateboarding.

For some reason I’m on my first horror movie streak at the moment.

I don’t think it is related to my marriage… hummmm…

So:

Saw IV

This one sparked the curiosity.  Thanks to my friend Jorge (who keeps an excellent movie blog) I watched this one and wasn’t totally repulsed.  Having studied a good bit of anatomy and being very interested in the body, the opening scene caught my interest.  Then Jorge explained the premise and it sounded interesting enough to continue watching, and while it wasn’t an amazing movie it was certainly interesting.

Saw V

I think I might have missed out on some of the atmosphere by watching a low quality version online.  But I’m not sure, because the plot didn’t capture me nearly as much as the previous one.  The detail of the tibia splintering… hummmmm, yummy…..

Let the Right One In

This is a good one.  Happens to be non-american (surprise) and it really felt innovative, simple, complex, vague enough to allow imagination to do its thing (which it does better than CGI).  I highly recommend this one.

Session 9

We’ll see, I’m about to watch it… we’ll see we’ll see we’ll see.

all it is is a change in attitude”

A simple movie.  Simple in the simplicity with which the story is told.  Narration, images, stills.  I enjoyed it for its simplicity, its honesty, its story, and its message.

Recommended

I was very bored watching this movie.  And frustrated by the way the characters interacted with each other – choosing the path of most conflict.

Not-recommended despite the many good ratings one can find on imdb and other places.